2006 MG ZR vs. 2012 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 MG ZR would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2006 MG ZR. (159 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2006 MG ZR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 572 kg more than 2006 MG ZR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (409 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG ZR. (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG ZR. 2012 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 2006 MG ZR has manual transmission. 2006 MG ZR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 MG ZR 2012 Ford Falcon
Make MG Ford
Model ZR Falcon
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 3983 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 159 HP 265 HP
Engine RPM 6900 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 409 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 92.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89.3 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 12.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium LPG
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1185 kg 1757 kg
Vehicle Length 4020 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2838 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 68 L