2006 MG ZT-T vs. 2010 Holden Barina
To start off, 2010 Holden Barina is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 MG ZT-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 MG ZT-T would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 MG ZT-T (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Barina. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 MG ZT-T | 2010 Holden Barina | |
| Make | MG | Holden |
| Model | ZT-T | Barina |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
