2006 MG ZT vs. 1954 Singer Hunter
To start off, 2006 MG ZT is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZT (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1954 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1954 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZT weights approximately 420 kg more than 1954 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 MG ZT | 1954 Singer Hunter | |
Make | MG | Singer |
Model | ZT | Hunter |
Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2180 mm |