2006 MG ZT vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 MG ZT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZT (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZT weights approximately 440 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 MG ZT (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 MG ZT | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | MG | Triumph |
Model | ZT | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |