2006 MG ZT vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2006 MG ZT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZT weights approximately 510 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 MG ZT | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | ZT | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1910 mm |