2006 MG ZT vs. 2003 Spyker C8
To start off, 2006 MG ZT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2003 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZT weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Spyker C8.
Because 2003 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 MG ZT | 2003 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | MG | Spyker |
| Model | ZT | C8 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3999 cc |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 100 L |
