2006 MG ZT vs. 2012 Ford C-Max

To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 MG ZT would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZT (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZT weights approximately 60 kg more than 2012 Ford C-Max. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford C-Max (300 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG ZT. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG ZT.

Compare all specifications:

2006 MG ZT 2012 Ford C-Max
Make MG Ford
Model ZT C-Max
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 187 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 3750 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1500 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 4750 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1828 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1684 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2788 mm