2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1959 Seat 600
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 435 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (125 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 1959 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
| Model | Colt | 600 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2010 mm |
