2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1963 Seat 1400
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1400 would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1400.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Seat 1400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 1400. (88 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 1400.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 1963 Seat 1400 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
Model | Colt | 1400 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1395 cc |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2660 mm |