2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1975 TVR 3000
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 TVR 3000 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1975 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 1975 TVR 3000 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | TVR |
| Model | Colt | 3000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1493 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2290 mm |
