2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1978 Skoda L
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,835 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 350 kg more than 1978 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (294 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 1978 Skoda L | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Skoda |
Model | Colt | L |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1046 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 68.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 38 L |