2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1979 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Toyota Mark II (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 190 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (125 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1979 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 1979 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Colt | Mark II |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1332 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2590 mm |