2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 110 kg more than 2004 Spyker C8.
Because 2004 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Spyker |
| Model | Colt | C8 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3999 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 100 L |
