2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 170 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (294 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Colt | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 1149 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 69.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 22.3 seconds | 13.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 55 L |