2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (294 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Colt | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |