2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2008 Peugeot 406
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 406 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc, 2008 Peugeot 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Peugeot 406 weights approximately 360 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Peugeot 406. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Peugeot 406.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 2008 Peugeot 406 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Peugeot |
Model | Colt | 406 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1997 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 10 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 70 L |