2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2008 Proton Arena
To start off, 2008 Proton Arena is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Proton Arena. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Proton Arena. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Proton Arena.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 2008 Proton Arena | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Proton |
Model | Colt | Arena |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1468 cc |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 255 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91.1 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.7 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 50 L |