2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC60 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC60 (400 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. 2010 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 2006 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Colt | XC60 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2774 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 70 L |