2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2012 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2012 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Lincoln MKZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Lincoln MKZ weights approximately 692 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Colt | 2012 Lincoln MKZ | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Lincoln |
Model | Colt | MKZ |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1332 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1702 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 66 L |