2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP) has 366 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Because 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
| Model | Eclipse | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 6200 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 556 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1842 mm |
