2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 450 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Because 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Endeavor | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3835 cc | 6748 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 107 L |
