2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor (346 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1996 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
| Model | Endeavor | 400 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3835 cc | 1589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 346 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2560 mm |
