2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 155 kg more than 2007 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor (346 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Endeavor | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 55 L |