2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor (346 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Endeavor | E-350 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 57 L |