2006 Mitsubishi Galant vs. 1962 Steyr 700C
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Galant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant (160 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 700C.
Because 1962 Steyr 700C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Steyr 700C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Galant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Galant | 1962 Steyr 700C | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Steyr |
Model | Galant | 700C |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 641 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 1950 mm |