2006 Mitsubishi Galant vs. 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant (260 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant should accelerate faster than 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari.
Because 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari has automatic transmission and 2006 Mitsubishi Galant has manual transmission. 2006 Mitsubishi Galant will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Galant | 1983 Pontiac Grand Safari | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
Model | Galant | Grand Safari |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |