2006 Mitsubishi L 200 vs. 1989 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Toyota Celica (201 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi L 200. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi L 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1989 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi L 200 | 1989 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | L 200 | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2477 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Top Speed | 147 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |