2006 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. (97 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Lancer | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4690 mm |
