2006 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1990 Volvo 960

To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 120 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volvo 960 weights approximately 344 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Because 1990 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer (176 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Volvo 960. (143 Nm). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Volvo 960.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer 1990 Volvo 960
Make Mitsubishi Volvo
Model Lancer 960
Year Released 2006 1990
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 2383 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 176 Nm 143 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1206 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2780 mm