2006 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. In terms of performance, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 802 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. (262 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 190 kg more than 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 705 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. (355 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Koenigsegg |
| Model | Lancer | CCXR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 262 HP | 1064 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 1060 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.1 seconds | 2.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 22 L/100km |
