2006 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander (160 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 495 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Outlander | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |