2006 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 705 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Outlander | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 107 L |