2006 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1985 Volvo 780
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Volvo 780. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Volvo 780 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Volvo 780 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander (160 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1985 Volvo 780. (127 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1985 Volvo 780. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 315 kg more than 1985 Volvo 780. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Volvo 780. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Volvo 780 (250 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1985 Volvo 780 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1985 Volvo 780 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Outlander | 780 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2375 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 23.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 80 L |