2006 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero | 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Pajero | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1955 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 112 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3690 mm |
