2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 1977 Triumph Stag
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1977 Triumph Stag. (143 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1977 Triumph Stag.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Triumph Stag. (234 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Triumph Stag.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 1977 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
Model | Raider | Stag |
Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 234 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 63 L |