2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 1982 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda Rapid R.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 1982 Skoda Rapid R | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Skoda |
| Model | Raider | Rapid R |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1287 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2850 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 47 L |
