2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Raider | 240 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2660 mm |