2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 1999 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1999 Honda CR-V. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda CR-V.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 1999 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Honda |
| Model | Raider | CR-V |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1745 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
