2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Ram. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Ram.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
| Model | Raider | Ram |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3704 cc | 3906 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2790 mm |
