2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (319 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Raider | Endeavor |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3704 cc | 3835 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 81 L |
