2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser. (187 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (430 Nm @ 1200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Raider | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 4163 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1200 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 96 L |
