2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2010 Renault Duster
To start off, 2010 Renault Duster is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2010 Renault Duster. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Duster.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Duster. (177 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Duster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 2010 Renault Duster | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Raider | Duster |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 177 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4315 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1822 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2673 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
