2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2011 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2011 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2011 Ford Transit Connect. (136 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Transit Connect.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford Transit Connect. (173 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford Transit Connect.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 2011 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Raider | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 58 L |