2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2012 BMW X6
To start off, 2012 BMW X6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X6 (480 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW X6 (779 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 2012 BMW X6 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | BMW |
| Model | Raider | X6 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 480 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 779 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4879 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1689 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2934 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 85 L |
