2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2012 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2012 Daewoo Matiz.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 2012 Daewoo Matiz | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Daewoo |
| Model | Raider | Matiz |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 35 L |
