2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2013 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (490 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (569 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 2013 Aston Martin Virage | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Aston Martin |
Model | Raider | Virage |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 490 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4703 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2061 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1282 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 78 L |