2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2013 Dodge DART
To start off, 2013 Dodge DART is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2013 Dodge DART. (158 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2013 Dodge DART.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Dodge DART. (197 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Dodge DART.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 2013 Dodge DART | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
Model | Raider | DART |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4672 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1465 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2703 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 60 L |