2006 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2013 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2013 GMC Acadia is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Acadia (284 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 GMC Acadia. (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 GMC Acadia.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Raider | 2013 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Mitsubishi | GMC |
Model | Raider | Acadia |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 5101 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2003 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1846 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 3020 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 83 L |