2006 Mitsubishi Space Star vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 400 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star. (97 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mitsubishi Space Star | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | Space Star | 400 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1583 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.3 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2560 mm |