2006 Nissan 1400 vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2006 Nissan 1400 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2006 Nissan 1400. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan 1400 weights approximately 777 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan 1400. (97 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan 1400.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan 1400 | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Nissan | Reliant |
Model | 1400 | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2553 cc |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 97 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 798 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 38 L |